Zum Inhalt springen

BA Thesis: Conflict Resolution by Implementing a Truth- and Reconciliation Commission in Côte d’Ivoire? Ex-Ante Evaluation and Assessment

3. Dezember 2011

Abstract:

Background and Objectives of Study

It is especially a phenomenon of the second half of the 20th century that societies all over the world have overthrown dictatorships and toppled other totalitarian regimes – especially in Latin America, East Europe, the former Soviet Union, Africa – initiating a phase of transition towards free­dom and democracy. One elementary political and ethical question that results from such radical upheavals and with which such societies are confronted is how to deal with the lega­cies of repression and illiberal rule. As societies look back, try to understand a collec­tive fail­ure and to find solutions for dealing with a period of violence, they will have to deal with fun­damental issues in the areas of law, politics and morality such as the deficits in the rule of law and democratic governance and justice in order to reach sustainable peaceful co­existence and reconciliation. The necessity to resolve such questions and issues led to the de­velopment of the concept of transitional justice which has grown during the last decades to a normalized and globalized form of intervention in post-conflict situations in which such is­sues often tended to remain unsolved.[1] Recent upheavals in the Arab World and in Côte d’Ivoire (CI) show the importance and necessity of transitional justice as the countries already are confronted with the societies’ requests of how to deal with the legacies of the former re­pressive regimes. While there are several judicial approaches of transitional justice, Truth and Reconciliation Commissions (TRC) represent one non-judicial concept which became more and more prominent during the last decades and which was already announced to be imple­mented by the new president of CI, Ouattara.

This study discusses approaches of transitional justice in the context of the post-conflict situa­tion of Cote d’Ivoire (CI). In a first chapter, the theoretical context and fundament of transi­tional justice is reviewed and in a second part the non-judicial approach of a TRC will be dis­cussed in the context of CI. Particularly it will be assessed to what extent, under which condi­tions and in which forms a TCR, can be established so that it achieves most effect and impact on reconciliation of the society by working up atrocities of the past civil war.[2]

 

Table of Contents:
1. Background and Objectives of Study

5

  1.1       Defining Transitional Justice

5

  1.2       Historic Perspective on Transitional Justice

6

  1.3       International Law, the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice

 

7

2. Approaches of Transitional Justice

8

  2.1       Judicial Approaches of Transitional Justice

9

              2.1.1    Domestic Courts

9

              2.1.2    International Ad Hoc Tribunals

10

              2.1.3    Hybrid Courts

11

              2.1.4    The International Criminal Court (ICC)

12

  2.2       Non-Judicial Approaches of Transitional Justice

14

              2.2.1    The Truth- and Reconciliation Commission

14

              2.2.2    The Gacaca Tribunal

 

15

3. Conflict Resolution in Côte d’Ivoire by Implementing a TRC: Ex-Ante Evaluation and Assessment

17

  3.1       Overview on Côte d’Ivoire and Recent Developments

17

              3.1.1    Recent Developments

17

              3.1.2    Historic Background

18

  3.2       The Côte d’Ivoirian Commission of Inquiry 2004

21

  3.3       The Suitability of a Truth- and Reconciliation Commission

21

  3.4       A TRC’s Contribution to Justice: Recommending Judicial Reforms and   the Promotion of the Rule of Law

23

              3.4.1    Promoting The Role of a New Rule of Law and its Importance

23

              3.4.2    Recommending Judicial Reforms

24

  3.5       An Amnesty Law in CI? Assessing Potential Benefits and Risks

25

  3.6       Promoting Reparatory and Restorative Justice

28

              3.6.1    Reparations and Acknowledgement

28

              3.6.2    Broad Acceptance of the ‘Truth’

30

  3.7       Public Involvement as Essential Ingredient in Establishing a TRC

31

  3.8       Bringing Opposition Parties together by Cohesion Instruments

32

  3.9       Balancing Structural Inequalities

33

   

Page

4. Potential Risk Factors Preventing a TCRs’ Reconciliatory Impact

34

  4.1       Political Risk Factors

34

  4.2       Military Risk Factors

34

  4.3       Socio-economic Risk Factors and the Problem of “Ivoirité”

 

35

5. The Role of Third Parties: Critical Assessment and Prospect

36

  5.1       The Former Colonial Power France

36

  5.2       The Economic Community of West African States

37

  5.3       The United Nations

38

  5.4       The African Union

 

41

6. Conclusion and Prospect

 

43

7. List of References

46

If interested in this BA Thesis, please contact the administrator.

[1] Cf. Okello (2010: 273 – 284)

[2] Cf. Overview 1: Structure of the Thesis and Individual Links for a line out of the study concept

Von → Allgemein

Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

Kommentar verfassen

Trage deine Daten unten ein oder klicke ein Icon um dich einzuloggen:

WordPress.com-Logo

Du kommentierst mit Deinem WordPress.com-Konto. Log Out / Ändern )

Twitter-Bild

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Twitter-Konto. Log Out / Ändern )

Facebook-Foto

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Facebook-Konto. Log Out / Ändern )

Verbinde mit %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.