BA Thesis: Conflict Resolution by Implementing a Truth- and Reconciliation Commission in Côte d’Ivoire? Ex-Ante Evaluation and Assessment
Abstract:
Background and Objectives of Study
It is especially a phenomenon of the second half of the 20th century that societies all over the world have overthrown dictatorships and toppled other totalitarian regimes – especially in Latin America, East Europe, the former Soviet Union, Africa – initiating a phase of transition towards freedom and democracy. One elementary political and ethical question that results from such radical upheavals and with which such societies are confronted is how to deal with the legacies of repression and illiberal rule. As societies look back, try to understand a collective failure and to find solutions for dealing with a period of violence, they will have to deal with fundamental issues in the areas of law, politics and morality such as the deficits in the rule of law and democratic governance and justice in order to reach sustainable peaceful coexistence and reconciliation. The necessity to resolve such questions and issues led to the development of the concept of transitional justice which has grown during the last decades to a normalized and globalized form of intervention in post-conflict situations in which such issues often tended to remain unsolved.[1] Recent upheavals in the Arab World and in Côte d’Ivoire (CI) show the importance and necessity of transitional justice as the countries already are confronted with the societies’ requests of how to deal with the legacies of the former repressive regimes. While there are several judicial approaches of transitional justice, Truth and Reconciliation Commissions (TRC) represent one non-judicial concept which became more and more prominent during the last decades and which was already announced to be implemented by the new president of CI, Ouattara.
This study discusses approaches of transitional justice in the context of the post-conflict situation of Cote d’Ivoire (CI). In a first chapter, the theoretical context and fundament of transitional justice is reviewed and in a second part the non-judicial approach of a TRC will be discussed in the context of CI. Particularly it will be assessed to what extent, under which conditions and in which forms a TCR, can be established so that it achieves most effect and impact on reconciliation of the society by working up atrocities of the past civil war.[2]
| 1. | Background and Objectives of Study |
5 |
| 1.1 Defining Transitional Justice |
5 |
|
| 1.2 Historic Perspective on Transitional Justice |
6 |
|
| 1.3 International Law, the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice
|
7 |
|
| 2. | Approaches of Transitional Justice |
8 |
| 2.1 Judicial Approaches of Transitional Justice |
9 |
|
| 2.1.1 Domestic Courts |
9 |
|
| 2.1.2 International Ad Hoc Tribunals |
10 |
|
| 2.1.3 Hybrid Courts |
11 |
|
| 2.1.4 The International Criminal Court (ICC) |
12 |
|
| 2.2 Non-Judicial Approaches of Transitional Justice |
14 |
|
| 2.2.1 The Truth- and Reconciliation Commission |
14 |
|
| 2.2.2 The Gacaca Tribunal
|
15 |
|
| 3. | Conflict Resolution in Côte d’Ivoire by Implementing a TRC: Ex-Ante Evaluation and Assessment |
17 |
| 3.1 Overview on Côte d’Ivoire and Recent Developments |
17 |
|
| 3.1.1 Recent Developments |
17 |
|
| 3.1.2 Historic Background |
18 |
|
| 3.2 The Côte d’Ivoirian Commission of Inquiry 2004 |
21 |
|
| 3.3 The Suitability of a Truth- and Reconciliation Commission |
21 |
|
| 3.4 A TRC’s Contribution to Justice: Recommending Judicial Reforms and the Promotion of the Rule of Law |
23 |
|
| 3.4.1 Promoting The Role of a New Rule of Law and its Importance |
23 |
|
| 3.4.2 Recommending Judicial Reforms |
24 |
|
| 3.5 An Amnesty Law in CI? Assessing Potential Benefits and Risks |
25 |
|
| 3.6 Promoting Reparatory and Restorative Justice |
28 |
|
| 3.6.1 Reparations and Acknowledgement |
28 |
|
| 3.6.2 Broad Acceptance of the ‘Truth’ |
30 |
|
| 3.7 Public Involvement as Essential Ingredient in Establishing a TRC |
31 |
|
| 3.8 Bringing Opposition Parties together by Cohesion Instruments |
32 |
|
| 3.9 Balancing Structural Inequalities |
33 |
|
|
Page |
||
| 4. | Potential Risk Factors Preventing a TCRs’ Reconciliatory Impact |
34 |
| 4.1 Political Risk Factors |
34 |
|
| 4.2 Military Risk Factors |
34 |
|
| 4.3 Socio-economic Risk Factors and the Problem of “Ivoirité”
|
35 |
|
| 5. | The Role of Third Parties: Critical Assessment and Prospect |
36 |
| 5.1 The Former Colonial Power France |
36 |
|
| 5.2 The Economic Community of West African States |
37 |
|
| 5.3 The United Nations |
38 |
|
| 5.4 The African Union
|
41 |
|
| 6. | Conclusion and Prospect
|
43 |
| 7. | List of References |
46 |